We’d like to propose a general discussion session on the present and future of electronic publishing in the historical profession.
We have all been involved in the creation of a new professional organization, the Society for U.S. Intellectual History, which came into being during the summer of 2011. (We’re so new that we do not even have a website yet, though you can find out about us on the U.S. Intellectual History blog, which is affiliated with S-USIH.) S-USIH’s two major, existing projects are our blog and our conference, both of which predate the existence of the Society. But one of the reasons that we wanted to form a society is that we are interesting in exploring the possibility of creating some sort of journal. I think we all feel that this will likely be an electronic journal. But this immediately raises a series of questions that we have only begun to explore.
What forms might an e-journal take? Does an e-journal differ simply in its method of distribution? Or does its electronic format potentially allow us to promote and distribute different forms of scholarship from those that might appear in a printed journal? How does an e-journal credential itself in our discipline? How have other e-journals answered these questions?
Or is the very idea of an e-journal—an electronic version of a form created in a print-bound world—a failure to explore the horizons of electronic publishing and digital scholarship? Should the publication program of a new professional society in 2012 take an entirely different form?
In this session, we’d hope to gather those interested in exploring these questions in a more general context. Among the general questions we’re particularly interested in exploring: What are the new scholarly possibilities opened up by electronic publication? What are the expenses—in hardware, software, bandwith, etc.—associated with a serious e-publication program? How can some vital technologies associated with traditional scholarly publication—e.g. peer review—be translated to an electronic age?
Ben Alpers,
Lauren Kientz Anderson,
Ray Haberski,
Andrew Hartman,
Tim Lacy,
Nice and practical — should make for a good session, especially since there might well be folks there with experience. We had a THATCamp Publishing a few months ago, by the way, which was attended by a lot of university librarians at places that provide journal publishing services. Here are the notes from that session, with a list of things to think about when you want to start a journal: docs.google.com/document/d/1j5Qhp2qE7RmcBTElqTfZ1cNyZpTXveXhfSs0f3uE4KM/edit?hl=en_US
See also the other notes from THATCamp Publishing, available via publishing2011.thatcamp.org/archives/370